Post­doc­toral researcher wanted!

The Max Planck Insti­tute for Human Cog­ni­tive and Brain Sci­ences (MPI CBS) in Leipzig and the Max Planck Research Group “Audi­tory Cog­ni­tion” (headed by Jonas Obleser) are now offer­ing a Post­doc­toral researcher posi­tion, for ini­tially 2 years, prefer­ably start­ing by Octo­ber 2013.

Suc­cess­ful can­di­dates will have a PhD in cog­ni­tive neu­ro­science, psy­chol­ogy, or nat­ural sci­ences. Prior expe­ri­ence with either fMRI or EEG/MEG meth­ods is expected, and an inter­est in fur­ther apply­ing and com­bin­ing both domains in their research is highly desir­able. Can­di­dates with a back­ground and/or inter­est in advanced fMRI meth­ods are par­tic­u­larly encour­aged to apply.

The suc­cess­ful can­di­date will share our enthu­si­asm in prob­lems of audi­tory cog­ni­tion and audi­tory neu­ro­science, and ide­ally has already demon­strated this by con­tribut­ing to the field. How­ever, researchers with a back­ground in visual or other neu­ro­science are also encour­aged to apply. He or she should have a solid meth­ods back­ground and strong meth­ods inter­est, hands-on expe­ri­ence in prob­lems of data and sta­tis­ti­cal analy­sis, and the inter­est to co-supervise the PhD and Mas­ter stu­dents in the group. The posi­tion offered does not include any teach­ing oblig­a­tions.
Start­ing date is flex­i­ble. Salary is depen­dent on expe­ri­ence and based on MPI stipends or equiv­a­lent salary accord­ing to Ger­man Pub­lic ser­vice regulations.

The research will be con­ducted at the MPI CBS in Leipzig, Ger­many, an inter­na­tion­ally lead­ing cen­tre for cog­ni­tive and imag­ing neu­ro­science equipped with a 7.0 T MRI scan­ner, three 3.0 T MRI scan­ners, a 306 chan­nels MEG sys­tem, a TMS sys­tem and sev­eral EEG suites. All facil­i­ties are sup­ported by expe­ri­enced IT and physics staff. Our insti­tute (just 190 km, or 70 min­utes by train, south of Berlin) offers a very inter­na­tional envi­ron­ment, with Eng­lish being the lan­guage spo­ken in the lab­o­ra­tory. It offers a friendly and gen­er­ous envi­ron­ment of researchers with diverse back­grounds and with an excel­lent infrastructure.

In order to increase the pro­por­tion of female staff mem­bers, appli­ca­tions from female sci­en­tists are par­tic­u­larly encour­aged. Pref­er­ence will be given to dis­abled per­sons with the same qualification.

Appli­ca­tions should be kindly sent to personal@cbs.mpg.de using the appli­ca­tion code “PD 03÷2013” in the sub­ject. Please send your appli­ca­tion as a sin­gle pdf attach­ment, with the file name con­tain­ing your sur­name. It should enclose a cover let­ter (max. 2 pages) that also spec­i­fies your future research inter­ests; a CV; up to three rep­re­sen­ta­tive reprints; and con­tact details of 2 per­sonal ref­er­ences. This call remains open until the posi­tion is filled.

For fur­ther details please con­tact Dr Jonas Obleser, Max Planck Insti­tute for Human Cog­ni­tive and Brain Sci­ences, Leipzig, Ger­many, obleser@cbs.mpg.de
http://www.cbs.mpg.de
http://www.cbs.mpg.de/groups/misc/mprg-ac
http://obleserlab.com

07. May 2013 by Steven Kalinke
Categories: Editorial Notes, Job Offers |

Spek­trum on neural oscil­la­tions (Henry & Obleser)

Ger­man sci­ence mag­a­zine Spek­trum pub­lished an arti­cle on our recent paper (see our post):

Fre­quency mod­u­la­tion entrains slow neural oscil­la­tions and opti­mizes human lis­ten­ing behavior

issued in PNAS here.

Illus­trated with our nice group photo you can read the arti­cle: Mit Rhyth­mus geht auch Hören besser by Annegret Faber online.

27. March 2013 by Dr. Jonas Obleser
Categories: Neural Oscillations | Tags: |

New paper out: Her­rmann, Henry, and Obleser in Jour­nal of Neurophysiology

In this study (avail­able online)

Frequency-specific adap­ta­tion in human audi­tory cor­tex depends on the spec­tral vari­ance in the acoustic stimulation

we show that adap­ta­tion of neural responses in human audi­tory cor­tex to acoustic stim­u­la­tion is not fixed. Instead, the degree of co-adaptation in these tono­topi­cally orga­nized brain regions varies (widens/tightens) with the spec­tral prop­er­ties of the acoustic stim­u­la­tion. We relate this to sen­sory mem­ory processes and short-term plas­tic­ity which allows for the neural sys­tem to adjust to the acoustic prop­er­ties in the environment.

01. March 2013 by Dr. Björn Herrmann
Categories: Auditory Neuroscience | Tags: , , , |

New Paper in press — Scharinger, Henry, Obleser, in Mem­ory & Cognition

For normal-hearing humans, cat­e­go­riz­ing com­plex acoustic stim­uli is a seem­ingly effort­less process, even if one has never heard the par­tic­u­lar sounds before. Nev­er­the­less, prior expe­ri­ence with spe­cific cor­re­la­tions between acoustic stim­u­lus prop­er­ties affects the cat­e­go­riza­tion in a ben­e­fi­cial way, as we show in our paper:

Prior expe­ri­ence with neg­a­tive spec­tral cor­re­la­tions pro­motes information-integration dur­ing audi­tory cat­e­gory learn­ing (by Math­ias Scharinger, Molly Henry, and Jonas Obleser).

The arti­cle is in press at Mem­ory & Cog­ni­tion (avail­able online). Our main find­ing is that stim­uli dif­fer­ing in the loca­tion of two spec­tral peaks were bet­ter cat­e­go­rized if there was a neg­a­tive cor­re­la­tion between the two spec­tral peaks than if there was a pos­i­tive cor­re­la­tion. Since neg­a­tive spec­tral cor­re­la­tions char­ac­ter­ize pho­netic speech prop­er­ties, our find­ings sug­gest that short-term audi­tory cat­e­gory learn­ing is influ­enced by long-term rep­re­sen­ta­tions of abstract acoustic-phonetic prop­er­ties (here: spec­tral correlations).

01. February 2013 by Dr. Mathias Scharinger
Categories: Papers, Publications | Tags: , , , , |

New paper out: Henry & Her­rmann, Jour­nal of Neuroscience

Proud to announce that our post­docs Molly Henry and Björn just came out with a review/op piece in the Jour­nal of Neu­ro­science “jour­nal club” sec­tion, where only grad stu­dents or post­docs are allowed to author short review pieces.

“A Pre­clud­ing Role of Low-Frequency Oscil­la­tions for Audi­tory Per­cep­tion in a Con­tin­u­ous Pro­cess­ing Mode”

 

The Jour­nal of Neu­ro­science, 5 Decem­ber 2012, 32(49): 17525–17527; doi: 10.1523/​JNEUROSCI.4456–12.2012

Molly and Björn review (and com­ment on) an impor­tant paper by our friends and col­leagues Christoph Kayser and Benedikt Ng in the same jour­nal. Essen­tially, they argue for the dis­tinc­tion of a con­tin­u­ous from an oscil­la­tory pro­cess­ing mode in lis­ten­ing, and pro­vide ten­ta­tive expla­na­tions of why some­times misses might be more mod­u­lated by neural oscil­la­tory phase than hits. Con­grats, guys!

18. December 2012 by Dr. Jonas Obleser
Categories: Neural Oscillations |

← Older posts