On this years SPIN (Speech in Noise) workshop in Marseille, our very own Malte Wöstmann received the Colin Cherry Best Poster Award, elected by workshop attendees.
Judge for yourself and check out the Poster (PDF) here.
On this years SPIN (Speech in Noise) workshop in Marseille, our very own Malte Wöstmann received the Colin Cherry Best Poster Award, elected by workshop attendees.
Judge for yourself and check out the Poster (PDF) here.
Björn Herrmann has yet another paper in press in the Journal of Neuroscience!
Dynamic Range Adaptation to Spectral Stimulus Statistics in Human Auditory Cortex
The paper is now available online free of charge, and—funnily enough—appeared right on January 1, 2014.
German public television broadcaster 3sat featured our research on neural oscillations (see our PNAS Paper) in its series nano .
Unfortunately it’s only in German. However, have fun watching it:
Oscillatory Phase Dynamics in Neural Entrainment Underpin Illusory Percepts of Time
Natural sounds like speech and music inherently vary in tempo over time. Yet, contextual factors such as variations in the sound’s loudness or pitch influence perception of temporal rate change towards slowing down or speeding up.
A new MEG study by Björn Herrmann, Molly Henry, Maren Grigutsch and Jonas Obleser asked for the neural oscillatory dynamics that underpin context-induced illusions in temporal rate change and found illusory percepts to be linked to changes in the neural phase patterns of entrained oscillations while the exact frequency of the oscillatory response was related to veridical percepts.
The paper is in press and forthcoming in The Journal of Neuroscience.
Update:
Paper is available online.
When we listen to sounds like speech and music, we have to make sense of different acoustic features that vary simultaneously along multiple time scales. This means that we, as listeners, have to selectively attend to, but at the same time selectively ignore, separate but intertwined features of a stimulus.
A newly published fMRI study by Molly Henry, Björn Herrmann, and Jonas Obleser found a network of brain regions that responded oppositely to identical stimulus characteristics depending on whether they were relevant or irrelevant, even when both stimulus features involved attention to time and temporal features.
You can check out the article here:
http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/08/23/cercor.bht240.full
We are proud to announce that PhD student Julia Erb just came out with a paper issued in Journal of Neuroscience:
The Brain Dynamics of Rapid Perceptual Adaptation to Adverse Listening Conditions
Grab it here:
Listeners show a remarkable ability to quickly adjust to degraded speech input. Here, we aimed to identify the neural mechanisms of such short-term perceptual adaptation. In a sparse-sampling, cardiac-gated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) acquisition, human listeners heard and repeated back 4‑band-vocoded sentences
For normal-hearing humans, categorizing complex acoustic stimuli is a seemingly effortless process, even if one has never heard the particular sounds before. Nevertheless, prior experience with specific correlations between acoustic stimulus properties affects the categorization in a beneficial way, as we show in our paper:
Prior experience with negative spectral correlations promotes information integration during auditory category learning
(by Mathias Scharinger, Molly Henry, and Jonas Obleser).
The article is in press at Memory & Cognition (available online). Our main finding is that stimuli differing in the location of two spectral peaks were better categorized if there was a negative correlation between the two spectral peaks than if there was a positive correlation. Since negative spectral correlations characterize phonetic speech properties, our findings suggest that short-term auditory category learning is influenced by long-term representations of abstract acoustic-phonetic properties (here: spectral correlations).
Proud to announce that our postdocs Molly Henry and Björn Herrmann just came out with a review/op piece in the Journal of Neuroscience “journal club” section, where only grad students or postdocs are allowed to author short review pieces.
The Journal of Neuroscience, 5 December 2012, 32(49): 17525–17527; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4456–12.2012
Molly and Björn review (and comment on) an important paper by our friends and colleagues Christoph Kayser and Benedikt Ng in the same journal. Essentially, they argue for the distinction of a continuous from an oscillatory processing mode in listening, and provide tentative explanations of why sometimes misses might be more modulated by neural oscillatory phase than hits. Congrats, guys!